Sunday, July 25, 2010

Calvin and Hobbes and Aristotle

There's a wonderful scene in the C.S. Lewis biopic The Shadowlands, where Anthony Hopkins, as Lewis, explains Aristotle's ethics to a group of fresher tutorialists. Pipe pressed between his lips, Hopkins ponders the relationship between character and action: which is more important for judging the measure of a man? "Aristotle's solution," he pontificates, "was simple, and revolutionary." There was no difference. Character was action--it was habit, whose existence was only meaningful to the extent it was enacted.

Thus saith Lewis (and Hopkins). And herewith saith Waterson (and Hobbes):


One of the delights of C&H is the breezy encounters one has with some of the truly Great Questions. The off-handed manner and unexpected locale makes them all the more delicious.

2 comments:

  1. Lost you here...Character was action--it was habit, whose existence was only meaningful to the extent it was enacted.

    Are you saying *habit's* existence was only meaningful to the extent it was enacted? or Character or action?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Have you seen the movie "The Shoes of the Fisherman" with Anthony Quinn?
    I think you might enjoy it...about the role of the church in the modern world - making a hard choice.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Shoes_of_the_Fisherman

    ReplyDelete